Since the early 1980s, there has been a
historically unprecedented increase in the federal prison population. Some of
the growth is attributable to changes in federal criminal justice policy during
the previous three decades. An issue before Congress is whether policymakers
consider the rate of growth in the federal prison population sustainable, and
if not, what changes could be made to federal criminal justice policy to reduce
the prison population while maintaining public safety.
This report explores the issues related to
the growing federal prison population. The number of inmates under the Bureau
of Prisons’ (BOP) jurisdiction has increased from approximately 25,000 in
FY1980 to nearly 219,000 in FY2012. Since FY1980, the federal prison population
has increased, on average, by approximately 6,100 inmates each year. Data show
that a growing proportion of inmates are being incarcerated for immigration-
and weapons-related offenses, but the largest portion of newly admitted inmates
are being incarcerated for drug offenses. Data also show that approximately 7
in 10 inmates are sentenced for five years or less.
Changes in federal sentencing and
correctional policy since the early 1980s have contributed to the rapid growth
in the federal prison population. These changes include increasing the number of
federal offenses subject to mandatory minimum sentences; changes to the federal
criminal code that have made more crimes federal offenses; and eliminating
parole. There are several issues related to the growing federal prison
population that might be of interest to policymakers:
• The
increasing number of federal inmates, combined with the rising per capita cost
of incarceration, has made it increasingly more expensive to operate and maintain
the federal prison system. The per capita cost of incarceration for all inmates
increased from $19,571 in FY2000 to $26,094 in FY2011. During this same period
of time, appropriations for the BOP increased from $3.668 billion to $6.381
billion.
• The
federal prison system is increasingly overcrowded. Overall, the federal prison
system was 39% over its rated capacity in FY2011, but high- and medium-security
male facilities were operating at 51% and 55%, respectively, over rated capacity.
At issue is whether overcrowding might lead to more inmate misconduct. The
results of research on this topic have been mixed. One study found that
overcrowding does not affect inmate misconduct; but the BOP, based on its own
research, concluded that there is a significant positive relationship between
the two.
• The
inmate-to-staff ratio has increased from 4.1 inmates per staff member in FY2000
to 4.9 inmates per staff member in FY2011. Likewise, the inmate to correctional
officer ratio increased from 9.8 inmates per correctional officer in FY2000 to
10.2 inmates per correctional officer in FY2011, but this is down from a high
of 10.9 inmates per correctional officer in FY2005.
• The
growing prison population is taking a toll on the infrastructure of the federal
prison system. The BOP reports that it has a backlog of 154 modernization and repair
projects with an approximate cost of $349 million for FY2012. Past appropriations
left the BOP in a position where it could expand bedspace to manage
overcrowding but not reduce it. However, reductions in funding since FY2010
mean that the BOP will lack the funding to begin new prison construction in the
near future. At the same time, it has become more expensive to expand the BOP’s
capacity.
Should Congress choose to consider policy
options to address the issues resulting from the growth in the federal prison
population, policymakers could choose options such as increasing the capacity
of the federal prison system by building more prisons, investing in
rehabilitative programming, or placing more inmates in private prisons.
Policymakers might also consider whether
they want to revise some of the policy changes that have been made over the
past three decades that have contributed to the steadily increasing number of
offenders being incarcerated. For example, Congress could consider options such
as (1) modifying mandatory minimum penalties, (2) expanding the use of
Residential Reentry Centers, (3) placing more offenders on probation, (4)
reinstating parole for federal inmates, (5) expanding the amount of good time
credit an inmate can earn, and (6) repealing federal criminal statutes for some
offenses.
The
report includes useful tables and charts, including this one showing the growing
per capita cost of housing federal prisoners at various security levels:

No comments:
Post a Comment